Advanced Guide: Participatory Budgeting
Return to Main Documentation
ENGLISH
ENGLISH
  • PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING
  • 1.- PROJECT PRESENTATION PHASE
    • 1.1. CITY-WIDE PROJECTS
    • 1.2. DISTRICT PROJECTS
    • 1.3. VIABLE PROJECTS
    • 1.4. NON-VIABLE PROJECTS
    • 1.5. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION (Project Submission Phase)
    • 1.6. GROUPING OF PROJECTS
  • 2. INITIAL PROJECT REVIEW PHASE
  • 3. SUPPORT PHASE
  • 4. PROJECT EVALUATION PHASE
    • 4.1. COMPLETION OF THE REPORT
    • 4.2.REPORTS: CASUISTRY AND PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED
  • 5. REVIEW OF COSTS
  • 6. VOTING PHASE
  • TYPE RESPONSES AND SOME EXAMPLES FOR THE INVIABILITY REPORTS OF THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED (phase 1 & 4)
    • Not the city council's competence
    • Typology Mail Participative Budgets
      • 1.-Multiproject and all valid contents
      • 2.-Non-especific project
      • 3.-Multiproject and non-especific (at the same time)
      • 4.-Expenditure project that responds to particular interests
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. TYPE RESPONSES AND SOME EXAMPLES FOR THE INVIABILITY REPORTS OF THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED (phase 1 & 4)
  2. Typology Mail Participative Budgets

4.-Expenditure project that responds to particular interests

It has been detected that this is a project that responds to particular interests that generate direct economic benefits to a particular entity outside the public interest.

Therefore, the proposed project cannot be included in the participatory budgeting process of the City Council and must be considered unfeasible.

The information on the viability or not of participatory budgets is published in the FAQs section on the Participatory Budgets website.

Previous3.-Multiproject and non-especific (at the same time)

Last updated 1 year ago